The Way Forward Replay: Amandha Vollmer (ADV) and Alec Zeck Talk About Healing with DMSO

Amandha: Yeah, I mean, I think there are many ways to come to truth. You can go the real long route, long, painful, confusing route, or you can actually just go right to the source and figure it out. You’ve got options, right? And so there’s no, is there a wrong way to truth? Maybe not is there a better way to truth? Definitely. And being an efficient person, I want to always not waste my time. And as time is our life it’s precious and I want to know I crave knowledge. I want to understand what this is about, this place, and that’s a drive inside of you. And not everybody maybe has that drive as well. So it has to come through a painful experience. How many patients have I had that have come to me through so much pain and suffering by listening to what doctors and specialists told them to do about their health? And that’s how they came to the awareness is they had to go through a lot of dishonest experiences and pain and suffer. And that’s how they came to it, you know? So, but I think discernment is where we need to be with it within this community. Okay. This is a slide I like because there are unicorns. Now we’ve, it’s interesting cuz they couldn’t make monkey puck stick. They couldn’t, you know, they, you could see them experimenting with the marketing to see what.

Amandha: Take they tried with the hiv aspect as well earlier on that, that, that was a comorbidity or something to do with the shots or whatever. And I mean, we’ve debunked that as an existence long ago, maybe they couldn’t get that told water, but most people came out to me and said, well, what’s RSV? I never heard of this one. You know? Well that’s because it’s usually something that we see in children as a common exam and people don’t even know what exanthems are. We have growth spurts in childhood, and when you are moving massive amounts of tissue and creating and building and clearing to make more tissue rapidly, I mean, my child would grow literally overnight. She would be one size, one going to bed and in the morning a different size. That’s rapid growth. You have to mobilize a lot of wastes. In order to get that job done. Now, if you have a complication in the tissue, then you’re gonna have to move it and mobilize it through other roots of elimination, not through the ideal root, which is the liver. You’ll have to use the lung tissue or the skin, which we see in measles and chicken PPOs and those thoses that are quite common. They, the body needs to move out in the construction site, all the fallen away in order to bring new materials in and get the job done. And it’s no different with the RSV experience.

Amandha: Now we have more discussion of it because when you’ve poisoned the heck outta people with shots and the other assaults that they receive including a frequency, you know, increases like emf or LF Frequ. You’re going to continually challenge the body to always adapt with new enzyme systems to try to keep up with the assaults. And at some point in time the defenses or the internal processes that try to ensure that those things that shouldn’t be in the body, those poisons are out, they collapse or they’re exhausted, or the new nutritional reserves and the cofactors that support those mechanisms are exhausted. And now you will see overt symptoms. This is what any kind of disease state looks like, is the overt pushing out of waste particles through all the roots of elimination skin. Your, you can even see metals come outta the hair. It’ll grow out of the hair.. Pushing it out of the hair, right? That’s why we do hair mineral analysis. We can see what the body’s been trying to cope with. Lung tissue is a classic because lung is a backup organ of elimination usually secondary to the liver. And if you can imagine a toxin that’s really not supposed to be in the lung tissue at all what’s it gonna do there? It’s gonna agitate the tissue and it’s gonna cause a reaction to the tissue to deal with.

Amandha: Now this bit of waste that shouldn’t be accumulating there, that should have already gone out through the liver, but now guess what? We’re gonna have to make mucus and we’re gonna have to cough it out. We’re gonna have to get it out in a different way. And if you continue to suppress going forward then you’ll get other organs involved. And usually that’s when you start seeing eczema and rashes and all this sort of thing coming out through the skin because it’s like, well, you won’t let me go through the liver. You won’t let me go through the lungs now. Maybe I’ll try. The skin, or maybe I’m gonna have to form tumors because I have to wall it off cause he won’t let me get this stuff out. And why I’m gonna do this particular angle on this presentation is because I wanna show you that if you have the eyes to see if you correct the way in which you see the information, then you can actually translate these studies appropriately so that You can read what they are actually doing in the lab, that you can understand why they’re saying what they’re saying and put it into the correct context. And it actually all does make sense. So this particular virus, which has never been isolated, no paper has shown a purity of a sample. There’s no real pictures of any of it. It’s all the same recycled pictures over and over again. I. Some down the road here. You can’t take pictures of something that doesn’t exist.

Amandha: They’re taking pictures of artifacts of cells, br of reformed artifacts and calling it a virus. So that’s one of the, you know, tricks, really magic tricks that’s done in the vi in virology is just showing a picture that looks impressive. And that could be any of many types of cell debris and calling it a virus. That’s not evidence. So the RSV is called respiratory syncytial virus. And basically why I picked this slide is I was trying to figure out what other ways do they treat it. I mean, they’re pushing this shot now, which they started vaccine creating a vaccine for this back in the fifties. That was the beginning. The first paper I read was when they were trying to formulate it in the fifties. And they’re now say, we’re gonna get this trivalent going. We’re gonna attack all of these viruses that suddenly are in everybody all at once. Which is never explained how that happens. Or the mechanisms which they don’t know, which I’ll show you, they don’t know. And this, but what I found here is there’s this, what they call an anti influenza drug, and that’s oseltamivir, which they always are gonna make the most ridiculous sounding terminology because they wanna make it sound like it’s super impressive. And they wanna make it hard for us to actually say, because you have to.

Amandha: It’s one of those ego tricks like, oh, I said this big word. Like, they do this all the time. When reading studies, you’re like, well, I can’t even break that down. Well, that’s because they’re all Latin words. They’re trying to describe the fever, they’re trying to describe some aspect of it, but most of these drug names are ridiculous. They could have called it something way more alien but they actually, they have normal names or they have common names for it. So what they’ve said they have a treatment for it. So this study found that the drug decreased RSV-induced weight loss, inhibited RSV clearance in mice. So they do these studies in mice models as suggesting that it’s effective in moderating it in humans. And then they’ve also done a similar model with another type of virus in mice and said that this is helping them recover quickly. And so it’s funny because it’s the same story that you get right where you are trying to push a new product. You’re trying to create a new product, which is a vaccine, but you already have other treatments that they’ve been using for this for a long time, which is always gonna be a suppressive treatment.

Amandha: And if you look into the drug me, Which is Tamiflu, by the way. This is called Tamiflu. When you look at the drug mechanism, you understand that these are just suppressive. They’re basically saying to the body that is trying to clear the wastes. No, don’t do that every single.

Alec: Can we comment on that real quick when it comes to like ivermectin or hydroxychloroquine as well? That’s what, yeah. Okay. Cause, cause that’s something that frustrates me is that so many people say, well I took ivermectin and I felt so much better afterwards. It like got rid of C, got rid of SARS-CoV-2. Immediately. I’m like, no, that’s just pushing toxicity deep into your tissues again. Relating back to what you said, dissecting these studies from the lens of true health. When you look at even the isolation studies, right, the isolation studies, a cell is experiencing foreign genetic material bombardment. It’s experiencing bombardment from a bunch of different sources of toxins, these antibiotics and ancos, and then it’s being starved of its nutrients. So yes, it experiences a cytopathic effect. It breaks down, it’s flushing out the toxins, essentially. And that’s what’s happening when you’re experiencing symptoms. And so when you take something like ivermectin or hydroxychloroquine, you’re just pushing those toxins deeper into the tissue, prolonging the problem for later.

Amandha: And that’s why you find RNA and DNA particles that are encapsulated. That’s why you are gonna see activity, bacterial activity at the site or the toolboxes I call that are offshoots of the bacteria, if you understand that. We have sum, or we have microzymas, which are own lineages that are pleomorphic, which means they change shape. So we have microorganisms in our body that change shape based on pH based, what needs to be cleaned up, and they will adapt to get the job done properly. And this is what they’re finding at the site, and this is what they’re blaming it on, you know, and rather than understanding that’s a response. That’s a healing response. It’s not the causation. And so that’s why if you make your, if you correct the way that you’re looking at this, you’ll see what they’re doing. You’ll understand the mechanisms a lot better when you start to read studies, which people really need to read them. And also on the hydroxychloroquine ivermectin story, you know, in a sense those people who promote, obviously they’re not awakened how the body, you have one point, is that what and where they were, I think they were valid in what they were saying was that, look, we have other treatments for this. Right? We, even if it’s oppressive and even whatever, right? But what I’m saying is, from their perspective, they’re like, look, we don’t need a shot because we are, we found are effective at suppressing. We don’t need a new suppressant in the shot because we have the suppressants already. And why are you forcing, yep.

Amandha: Us to do that. And why are you not allowing us to talk about the other suppressants or use them or get in trouble for using them? Right. And that’s because that’s the marketing coming into play. They don’t, they want you to want the new thing. They don’t want you to go to the old treatments that don’t have the same amount of clout because a lot of them don’t have their patents anymore. And we’ll earn the companies the same amount of money. Right. So that’s where that game gets all messy. And so it’s the same thing here. Yeah. We have the same suppressive types of treatments in Tamiflu for this as for the fake COVID story. Right. So Tammy flu is, this is the drug saying works for this particular condition. It’s a neuraminidase, so it’s a specific type of enzyme inhibitor. So it stops an. Process. Okay. That’s really all you know, I want I looked at the me, the drug and what it does and what it’s up to. So this is a si. So it’s a type of enzyme that cleaves acid, and this is a type of cells in all plants, animals, us, like it’s a common carb. They say they’re finding on cells. We’re taking these at face value. We’re assuming that this is true. I haven’t gone deep into even into that layer, but if you really wanted to hash it out, that’s where you have. So, but what they’re saying is that they have identified that whatever they’re calling a virus, it broke down those receptors or it broke down those carbohydrates.

Amandha: Now, if you correct your thinking and. At this from a terrain model, why would why would you get an increase in hydrate metabolism when you’re experiencing a detox response? What did you think That the body is needing energy in order to remove the waste that are causing inflammation in the tissues.? What, why would it not break down using an enzyme? Take CLE of sugar off the carbohydrate, carbohydrates, strings of sugars, and use them to produce ATP in your mechanisms, in your fuel, your mitochondria to get the job done. To me, that makes quick, logical sense of why you would see a carbohydrate metabolism going on, or I pulled this study talks about stress. It’s relatable, right? It’s like we know that our carb metabolism goes up during any sort of stress. And anytime you’re detoxing the body, that is considered a stress upon the body. And so of course you’re gonna need more nutrient intake because you’re using more of it, including needing to create more energy for the body to overcome and clean and finish the job. So to me, that makes perfect sense. But what are they doing? They’re telling the body, do not cleave those carbohydrates. So what happens? Nothing happens because now the body that was doing that cannot continue what it was doing. It stopped the mechanism. It didn’t stop. Of some sort of any have to do with that, but said to the body was, no, you cannot detox, you cannot get energy from the cell. Stop what you’re doing.

Amandha: And then they declare that as success. See, this is why the model is so backwards and warped. They think that this is the trade off. Say if somebody came up to you, they’d be like, you know what here’s a short-term illness and a long-term illness. Which do you want? Do you want the short-term illness? Pick one. Anyone in their right mind is gonna say, OB short-term illness. Thank you very much. Only [unclear] would say, yeah, no, I wanna suffer exactly what they’re doing. When they use these drugs to suppress, they are trading a short-term expression and rebalancing event of the body, and they are trading it for long-term organ damage over a period of time. You might not even see for years to come. They won’t even make the connections that’s what they’ve done to themselves. So this is the quagmire we find ourselves in when we’re trying to help people see what they’re doing to themselves when they apply the stoppage to the natural normal process, the cleansing process, the healing mechanisms that are inborn in every single one of us. And we cause this long-term debilitation, which we don’t want. Okay. So, in another study, here’s what I’m doing. I’m just literally picking terms from studies and plopping them in, and I’m just going so that you understand about this. Okay. Okay, so they’re claiming this is a subfamilies, fancy lineages now and how they did and how they, their family structure, which is all garbage.

Alec: They’re all differences. Real, real quick on that, like that’s all based in the nonsensical genomic sequencing process. So yeah, that’s where they’re coming up with these families of different types of viruses. It’s all based in extracting every fragment of RNA from either a cell culture or from an unpurified sample of snot. They then upload all those fragments into these computer programs that align those fragments based on a template of other viruses that they’ve isolated. And if they find a percentage of similarity between these strung together random fragments of RNA from an unpurified sample, then they’ll. Oh, this is a variation. Or if this is another type of a similar virus. And then they’ll contrast that against these electron micrograph images and whatever the cytopathic effect looks like. If it has somewhat of a similarity to other electron micrograph images, then they’ll say, oh, okay, this must be of the same family cuz it’s 90% similar or whatever. So then they’ll name that, it’s a family of this type of virus. Yep. That’s it.

Amandha: Perfectly said, Alec. That’s exactly what they do. It’s all a trick of the computer and misunderstanding of that. It’s our own RNA and DNA. Where I was gonna add in at the end of this project, which I didn’t get a chance to, is explanation of where the RNA and DNA particles come from, that they’re claiming are these viruses and so forth. But they’re coming from us. They’re ours. They’re part of our breakdown products of our own cellular tissue and the nucleic acid sequences. You could make up viruses. Forever. There will be an infinite amount because they’re all different permutations of our own cleaving nucleic acid sequences of our own.

Alec: Tom showed me a screenshot. Dr. Cowan showed me a screenshot, like I wanna say, two or three weeks ago now. You might have been on that call too, but he showed a screenshot of someone who conducts genomic sequencing, and they asked if they had done any controls on the genomic sequencing process, and they admitted that they actually had done controls on samples that were quote negative for SARS-CoV-2 and that through the RT-PCR process. Then doing the whole alignment process in the computer, they were able to get the genome of SARS-CoV-2, but they chalked it up to having so-called false positives with RT-PCR. So even they’re admitting that their process is nonsense, but they can’t deal with the cognitive dissonance, so they have to chalk it up to being a false positive.

Amandha: Yeah. Well, I mean, it’s so logical there. This is a scientism approach. This is not science, this is not properly rigorous approach to knowledge to what’s happening. Most of these studies you can’t even repeat well, right. Which is a problem in science if you can’t repeat your study, I don’t see any of these were being repeated personally. When I go and look up different aspects they’re all doing different variations. They’re not repeating. Okay. So what we’ve known, like what they say is what we know about the immunobiology of RSV infection has been from rodent models with explanation. So we’re doing is they’re studying a animal model and they’re extrapolating, basically that means they’re guessing that it’s relatable to human disease and they’re making a lot of leaps, in their logic to try to apply it. So they’re kind of working backwards from their, they have their hypothesis and they’re trying to make the data fit to line up with the hypothesis. That’s not science. They saved an incubation period. I have anything that proves that to be so, again, go into every single one of these studies and rip it apart. Who’s doing this? Who goes into the studies and goes, let’s, let me look at this, these two links, you know, 95, 1 8, 1 63, and let’s see, where did they come to this conclusion? How do they make meetings come? And you’ll see it. Everything falls apart in your hands when you do this. So it saying is, at the beginning of the illness, there’s some virus that’s floating through the air, right?

Amandha: Or somebody just sneezes and now all of a sudden, but that first person had to get it from somewhere and that other person had to get it from somewhere. So somehow it had to come from somewhere in the air. And had to land in the nasal. It has to, and then it starts replicating and rep, and then so you find it in nasal secretion and then you’re finding it now spreading into the upper respiratory tract to the lower airways, which this is supposed to be a disease that the bronchs, the smaller air vasculars in the lung. And so, but this is their language. It is presumed to be via direct along the respiratory epithelium or through aspiration of nasopharyngeal secretion. So they’re guessing, they don’t know. They just said it. They’re presuming it. They’re assuming it. They haven’t done a study to say that, oh, maybe the waste particles are coming up through the respiratory tract, out through the nasopharynx. And that’s why running them in the nose is because it’s actually coming from the lungs to the face to go out of the body through mucus, not coming from the nose down into the chest, and now creating a problem down there. Now, if you’re swallowing mucus, if you’re having a problem getting rid of me mucus. I’m sure they’ll find it in the gut too. And I’ll show you the other tissue test that they say that they claim that this is fit. So again, they say the mechanism spreads from the upper respiratory tract to lower, presume to be via direct spread. Okay? So this is all present. And this is their studies on RSV.

Amandha: So now they’re saying a possible mechanism. So they’re guessing, let’s say it’s the macrophages fault, they’re the ones who are taking it. They must be the ones. So this is a problem. When you don’t have the right model that you’re working with, you’re assuming that’s automatically true. You’re gonna try to make all your theories fit. That’s this reverse science. So here’s your fancy picture. Ooh, wow. Look at all them viruses and stuff. Like what you mean ciliated tissue? Damaged tissue. That’s what we’re seeing., right? So how, so these are supposed to be specific infected respiratory [cells], but I just see damaged tissue from chronic inflammation. Here there’s no specifics onto the design of what this virus is supposed to be doing. They never show that. They always showed this type of picture. So they did experimental respiratory syncytial virus pneumonia in monkeys. So here’s your, here’s how they’re they’re doing a lot of their lab work. They will, they have created monkeys that don’t have the serum antibodies for RSV. So basically, [unclear in recording], or they made sure that they had monkeys that didn’t have their mechanism. They don’t have that. So when they give the damaged tissues, which they’ve tried to grow in medium, which is all from Cytopathic effect, they’ve had to try to do all kinds of experiments to see which will actually give them a respiratory response. And if you look at those studies, they usually will get only a few of the monkeys really getting any able to really produce what they want.

Amandha: So they have to really try to manufacture the expressions that they’re trying to get, which is triggering something in there in the body to try to do the action the expression. So they’re trying to break the mechanism here in these monkeys. Here’s another one, they, it’s called host cell entry of respiratory syncytial virus involves macropinocytosis, followed by proteolytic activation of the F protein. Ooh, doesn’t that sound They know so much. That’s so smart. Those are so, such big words. They must know what they’re talking about. You know, and this is the magic show. But, so they’re saying that they’re their indicated that in to infect cells, the incoming virus either fuse their envelope directly with the plasma membrane or exploit clathrin-mediated endocytosis. But they’re not sure, but they’re pretty sure when looking at some of the literature that’s probably how they’re doing it. Like, they’re probably, you know, doing this weird fusing and this, they really hate us cause they really have all these strong mechanisms, to exploit our cells to get to just that tissue in the body and hurt us. Like it’s so, which is so weird because then virologists will also say that a virus is too weak to isolate directly from the fluids of a sick person. Yeah. Has all these other actions, but it can’t do that. So, right. So they can’t even just take a nasal swab and go, let me look at this under the right light.

Amandha: Whoa, you’re super infected, man. We are gonna do something about that. No, that’s not how they take it. Sample. That’s not the, what they do with the sample. They have to manufacture it out of the sample, which, you know, if anyone knows anything about Stefan Lanka, then look at his control studies that prove that you can manufacture any virus in the lab from healthy cells by stressing them to create this cytopathic effect. Yep. So here’s another study, right? This is saying that we ha it, it actually infects CD4 cell T cells now too. So it doesn’t just infect your epithelial cells of the lung, actually, it also infects these cells. So, even though the epithelial are the target, it can go, oh, it can go in the immune cells, macrophagic. Go B cells. It can’t just go anywhere. Now, cells that they claim are immune cells. Well, what it tells you is that the macrophages, the B cells, these if T cells are involved or whatever, they’re calling these cells. They’re the cleanup crew for the waste. That’s their job. They’re gonna go and they’re gonna eat up that stuff and they’re gonna help the body release it. Right? That’s what they’re calling infected There’s another, a whole bunch of other cells apparently infect basal cells too. So wow. This is a really deactive multi mechanism virus that does all this stuff where can alter all these different kinds of cells. So you know, their mechanism driving the switch in epithelial phenotype is in part driven by the induced type one and type three interfering response that we demonstrate is triggered early following RSV infection.

Amandha: So neutralization of this response attenuates the RSV-induced loss of ciliated cells. Oh. So what you’re saying again is when you stop the phenomenon of the body actually healing the tissue, okay, then you don’t get the ciliated cells being damaged anymore. You don’t get the cleansing effect or the body actually getting rid of the cells that needs to get rid of, which are probably damaged cilliated cells. Yeah. So. That thank you study for proving that all what that is that’s how the mechanism’s working. You see, when you have eyes to see, you can read it, right? Oh, here, but there’s more Alec. There’s more. Oh, it affects neural cells too. Don’t, you know, but it’s very complicated. It’s with G Protein, now there’s a G protein and that’s involved in the lung. Apparently the mechanisms are still poorly understood, but you know, but they could have, you know, respiratory sequelae. But I mean, we don’t understand how the respiratory sequelaeae happens. How they get worse, why they get worse, but because we don’t understand mechanisms, but we know they do. And then it talks about infants, you know, and elderly. They love to go, they love to, to go with that, right?, what does that mean? You know, young children, we have growth spurts, elderly, we have them already vaccinated to the high hell, so they’re already having cardiac and pulmonary problems and so forth. Yeah, they’re already struggling with their detox on so many levels from so much suppression.

Amandha: So of course you’re gonna see it more in those demographics. It’s has nothing to do with. Immune system, just not maybe children or their immune system just compromised cause they’re old. That is the bullshit story. It’s sold to us to convince us that they’re, that’s the story they’re selling and that you should eat it up. But that’s not what’s happening. So, infection can go elsewhere, it can be pneumonia, it can be otitis, it can cause sleep apnea is so, man, this virus is a bitch. She’s busy, she’s causing all kinds of everything. Shit. You know, everything, man. She’s like the, she’s like just rocking it in the hood. Just sent all the drugs. She’s doing it all. So, made a mix tape. Sold it on the corner too. Totally did, you know, just trying to get, just trying to get the word out. Yep. So, so [unclear RSV gene/protein reference], by the way, and that antagonizes, alpha, beta and gamma interfering responses. And this G protein [unclear] has been implicated with altered cytokine and chemokine expression by pulmonary, oh my god. So many big words. Oh, so what you’re saying is there’s all kinds of cells involved try to repair shit of inflammation at the site, and you have white blood cells also coming in to eat up the waste. Thanks for that. That’s what’s happening. Oh, and also neurogenic inflammation is associated with that.

Amandha: Well, you would assume so you’re gonna get inflammatory responses because how the body’s gonna open up the tissues to allow Yeah. Again, is not a bad thing. It’s not a bad thing. It’s not bad. It’s part of your healing mechanism to actually chronically we have problems and that’s when the mechanism’s broken and it doesn’t know how to cycle back and comments out down. But yeah, good. That’s healing. That’s how your body heals. This is just a, your body healing right there. Neurogenic inflammation. Thank you for that. Okay. I think that’s where I ended it because I was actually going to go to let’s see if I have it up. Some of these studies, RNA, basic function, RNA, you know, this kind of stuff and what it is and how it works.

Amandha: But it’s more gobbledy go, you know, it really is because none of this is done in vivo. This is all. Experiments outside of the body and playing with tinker toys really. And then the different types of RNA in humans and their functions. You know, you can easily find that we have RNA and DNA in our bodies and does it not make sense that when you’re purging that you’re gonna have damaged cells and you’re gonna find these things like it’s not really hard to think it through. It really isn’t. We don’t even know if ribosomes are really what they say they are either. I mean, I’ve been reading Gilbert Lang’s and Gerald and let me see if I can get you back here. Hold on. And you know, half of the stuff that we think we know about cell biology is also bunk. Right. Yeah. I mean, it, when I’m reading that, I’m like, like even the contents of the cell, like, like the contents of the cell, all these like characteristics and different aspects of the cell. We have no idea. No clue. No. I mean to, I didn’t know, I wasn’t taught in any of my scholastic training that there was a controversy around the sodium potassium pumps and any of the pumps and shuttle systems in the cell. I didn’t know that was contested. I have books of all the different cell involvements of shuttles and fricking channels, and it’s overwhelming how many channels and openings there are.

Amandha: There’s, there should be no cell membrane by the amount of in and out going on here and it actually does fall apart. The theory falls apart because what they’ve done is they’ve had to, to. New theory to make the existing theory actually work. Okay, well, the potassium smaller and it can get through this other ion gated channel, and we’re not actually seeing the pH change that we thought we would. So that’s not okay. Well, maybe what’s happening is there’s a new pump in this, there’s another pump. There’s a soap. Yeah. Yeah. You’re soap, sodium pump. And that’s what’s pushing the sodium back out. So it doesn’t destabilize that. Okay. But in order for that to happen, there’s to be another pump and they just keep doing this. Right? And then you go to school and that’s in the textbooks, and that’s what they tell you. And you don’t go further than that. You don’t question that. And they work with that going forward when they translate the science. And this is the quagmire that we are finding ourselves in, right? So we have to go right back to baseline and throw all the theories away. And start really from scratch with the corrected understanding that the body is brilliant, it knows what it’s doing, it has all the healing mechanisms intact. Yeah. And why? And now how can we allow the expression, how can we move and listen to nature and study nature and mimic nature, which all inventions come from mimicking nature.

Amandha: All the knowledge base that we have that actually holds waters all mimicking nature and listening to nature’s principles and how can we now come into homeostasis by supporting that release of the body rather than just continually tinkering with it and saying, no, don’t do that cause I don’t like having snot you know, Don’t like that. My chest is tight, you know? So make it like it. Make it go away, mommy, daddy, no honey. You hurt yourself by your behavior and this is a repercussion of your actions, and unfortunately, you’re gonna have to go through the suffering that you created for yourself and learn how to release and complete that and forgive yourself and not do it again right by.

Alec: That’s what someone was sharing in the chat too. I think it was. Holly was sharing in the chat that we’ve become so obsessed with comfortability, so we want to avoid pain, whether that’s emotional or physical at all costs. And what we’re doing, again, whether it’s an emotional trauma or it’s actual physical pain, we’re just suppressing the healing and making it worse down the line. It’s gonna come roaring back. And that applies to emotional stuff too, and our inability and unwillingness to look at those things. And it’s. You know, that’s why I’m so fascinated with the work of Veda Austin, Gerald Pollack, and I know you’ve been sort of exploring EZ water in the fourth phase of water and the structured water that lines our cells. And I think that understanding makes so much more sense that when we are overly toxified, whether that’s emotional or physical or both, or nutrient deficient, our bodies are going to have to flush out their cells and generate new cells in, in their places. And it’s all based in this new understanding of water and how, you know, nine out of 10 molecules in our body are water. Two, two-thirds of our weight is water. And it’s, it just makes so much more sense from that lens than sort of what you were talking about earlier, like putting pumps upon pumps and all these different mechanisms. It’s actually really quite simple. Yeah, and there’s not even a lipid bilayer, that whole story, those are all fragments of cellular removal and changeability at, you know, in, in vitro, not in vivo.

Amandha: And that the small amount of saute that relative to water that we have is being held together by the frequency of water. And it is the mechanism of the electricity transferring through the as ionic, you know, as hydrogen through the. The body that is what’s operating this system. And then we go and pollute the waters continually with these therapeutics and we wonder why we’re having worsening, you know, health outcomes and fertility issues and mental health issues and fra hormone imbalances and this sort of stuff. Well, and now imagine what you’re doing with frequency because the water is very sensitive to what’s around it, to the frequencies around it. It will pick that up quite readily. And then that’s now fusion of communication inside the body that the body’s gonna have to make mechanisms to overcome. So we’re constantly putting this in a period of stress. And stress upon stress is going to weigh down the system eventually and cause all kinds of chaos. And if we just left well enough alone, I mean, if we honestly just. Healthy, normal birth away from the obstetrics malarkey of hurting our children right out of the gate. Not even understanding that birth isn’t an emergency. It’s a massive, normal process. And allow that to the fourth, you know, trimester to happen properly.

Amandha: You don’t break the skin barrier at birth. You don’t even need to you know, not under bright lights and all of these foreign people. Crazy testing procedures and et cetera, that then guess what? The children from this are robust they my own child is a test case. I mean, never went to a hospital or doctor with her. She’s never been touched by any of them. And the only repercussion she ever gets is if she eats something stupid. Yep. And every time she does, I’m like, well, I allowed you the freedom to experience that stupidity. How do you feel?? You know? And she’s like, yeah, I know I wanted the stupid Halloween candy and here I am. I said, but you understand that inflammatory cycle is what’s creating the mucus in you and that you ate something that did that and your body wants to remove it and you overwhelmed your mechanism. So that’s why you have your congestion. And you don’t like your congestion. Right. It’s uncomfortable. Right. Yeah. I don’t like it. Well, then next time you think you wanna have that, Remember the discomfort of your congestion, right? Yep. And that will help you later in life when you’re making decisions about your habits and how they produce either health or ill health in your life. And you decide whether you’re worthy enough to feel well and you care about yourself enough not to poison yourself.

Amandha: You know? And if you are doing that, then that’s gonna point you to other issues that you’re gonna have to deal with, like emotional, you know, stuff or mental upset or things that you haven’t processed yet, why you would self-sabotage, right?. So it’s, it opens it out, it opens it up to the next generation really seeing this. And that’s my hope, is that there’ll be enough of us that will stay away from the white. And stop doing this to our children so that you can really clearly see the difference in the robust untouched child who doesn’t get any of these weird, odd diseases and leukemias and brain cancers and gut problems and autism, and you name the disease that they think is real. That’s all manufactured by the medical model. Before that, we didn’t have those things. We only. Mass poisonings, like from arsenic or from coal fallout or from all kinds of D T or other pesticide spray or other cam campaign government campaigns. of, you know, dropping certain things and testing populations that their poison and stuff. Or bad foods. Like there was one story of a woman who was actually making caramels with arsenic. She confused arsenic for some other powder that she’s putting in, and they, she poisoned and killed like thousands of people with her candy and they thought it was a virus for a long time too. So, you know, we’re gonna realize that’s not how we weren’t always sick and we weren’t always having chronic illness and needing a new vaccine to somehow save us from this.

Amandha: We just needed to stop shitting all around us and, you know, and clean up our lives so we don’t have rats running around and like, and have some sensibility to basics. Like if you’re gonna do open surgery on someone, you might wanna wash your hands. I mean, you know, you’re gonna introduce foreign material into someone’s body. They’re gonna have a really strong response. Their body’s gonna have to get that out. And if you just weaken them by cutting them open and giving them a bunch of suppressive drugs, they’re not gonna do so well. You know? But here we are, right? And we’re getting to it. But my hope is that more and more people will learn to pilot their own vessels and take charge of themselves and not fall for one more and another new virus and another new, cuz they’re gonna keep pushing that gambit until it’s exhausted.

Alec: Yeah. And that’s the thing too, even outside of the piece on vaccines is that the germ theory, Is the foundation for the large majority of pharmaceutical products. Even outside of the vaccine discussion. All of their other products that they create, the majority of them are for things to treat, infectious diseases and viral illnesses or bacteria infections. Right. So that’s again, why it’s so important to emphasize this because that industry quite literally relies on in multiple avenues, this nonsense regarding the idea of these germs that are being passed from person to person. But the thing I wanna touch on with you real quick, because I love your take on, you know, the phenomenon of contagion, what I’m referring to there is when two or more people get sick in the same space, And how that sort of plays and ties in with our water in our body. And then maybe pheromones as well. But taking into context, Veda Austin’s work and then also some of Gerald Pollack’s work on the EZ water in the fourth phase of water and how that’s what’s lining our cells. And yeah, I’d just love to hear your thoughts on the phenomenon of two or more people getting sick in the same space and then touching on why symptoms aren’t a bad thing again, sort of reiterating that one more time.

Amandha: Well, it’s interesting cause I’ll tell you, we have a lot of science to do. We really do because this is hundreds of years of suppressed knowledge where we’re not getting funding to do any of these studies to see about pheromone triggering and people, or harmonic resonance or sympathetic resonance, how that works or harmonics of water in different spaces or all of the different admixtures of what would trigger something else in somebody else. I mean, we do see. We do see the phenomenon of what people think is contagion. The problem is the explanation for the transference is completely false. And because of that, we’re, we haven’t been allowed to look elsewhere, we haven’t been allowed to do the work to help ourselves really understand when and how those things happen. And do we even need to ever know if we just prevented the problems that we’ve created in the first place, but maybe we had to create the problems so that we could study all kinds of other aspects of ourselves and, you know, realize what a lie is versus a truth and see who, what’s going on in this place. So obviously we had to go through this to be able to come to awareness. cause we didn’t want to, we didn’t like it easy, I guess, but you know one thing that I say to people is, you can thank anyone who triggers you into a detox because you needed it. And if you are around people who are expressing actively, their mechanisms are ongoing.

Amandha: Meaning there is a trigger mechanism inside of them that’s been flicked, like a switch being flicked. This is now a cascade effect has happened where this is a problem for the body. Many different signals have been sent through the waters to say, bring in the reserves that we need to. Fix this because we don’t wanna lose the whole body. We need to be able to get whatever this particular is moved through denatured and there’ll be a whole kind of admixture of methods and ways redundantly so to deal with that particular toxin at that particular tissue site for that particular individual with their pH and all of their different admixtures of their own layered self, right? So it’s as an individual as you can get. However, there are other advantageous things we see in people that are shared. Like we understand the phenomenon of women cycling together when they live together, around, together a lot. Which we know that there must be a hormone signal involved in that because it is a hormonal expression. And we, I’ve done a lot of studies on different types of pheromone triggers and what is a pheromone in humans. Which is not even studied very much. It’s hard to find that material because they don’t want that. That is not a advantageous, just like it’s not advantageous to have studies on pleomorphic cell lineages and somatids. Right.

Amandha: You only, I’ve only been able to find two or three studies on that very topic. So now have a trigger mechanism that’s been gifted, whether it’s in a belief system. I mean,, I told the story a few times. As soon as I stopped believing in contagion, I never picked up anything. It was my choice whether I wanted to be triggered into something or not. That’s what I went forward with. So if, cause I would see people with all sorts of expressions, obviously in my office. They would come in very sick and I would I would be worried. At the beginning I was like, oh I get what they have. I don’t wanna be that, but I wasn’t afraid because I had all my own tools, if I did right. I wasn’t worried because I knew I could take care of it anyway, so that’s why I was fine with it. But then I realized that’s not even how it works. And I was like, shit, I’m not believing that anymore. And so as soon as I stopped, I never ever picked up any idea off of anybody else after that night.

Amandha: Good boundaries as being very sensitive. Empath as well. Cause that would pick up their arthritis too. So it’s not just some particle idea. This is like, you can pick up and you can resonate with people and their emotions. You know, people have done those experience experiments I, I’ve talked about with people where like, I’ve been high before in my life and I get a con or someone gets a quote, contact high and, we didn’t hotbox a car or something. I’m talking about like, I smoked, I then went somewhere with them. And just by being around me, they’re like, dude, I feel high right now. Like that’s a perfect example. Yeah. Or the experiments where you’ll have one person leave the room and everybody is gonna think a certain thought in the room, or think something angry, or think something about them that’s negative and then they’re gonna walk into that room and they’re gonna see what they feel. Right? Yeah or what they’re picking up on. So we have other senses here, right? We have. Subconscious aspects to ourselves of belief. So we have placebo, no placebo effects. Those are, well, those are studied quite well actually. There, we know those mechanisms. So the thing is, there’s all kinds of things at play that could explain why someone would have an similar experience to someone else.

Amandha: It could be down to belief, it could be a resonance. And it could even be because they are genetically close enough, meaning their bodies at that time that specific family unit needs to go through a purge. Because they’ve all had common exposures, they’ve all lived under the same roof. They’ve all had similar shocks, emotional shocks, and other little traumas or things throughout the months and the seasonal triggers have come and it says, Hey guys, you know, you wanna get through the winter or you wanna get through this next season? Well, it’s time to purge and we’re gonna trigger you to purge. And so you’ll see a whole household go down. You know, together, and that could be related to the frequency set of their, of whatever we’re calling. Selling DNA, which again, is also still up for question. Yep. And could be the waters. The waters are the ones that control the DNA patterning from what I’m reading. And, but regardless, there’s still a frequency set and they’re similar enough and so they could be triggered similarly. And so just because we see a pattern or we see a confluence, doesn’t mean that it’s now automatically some particle floating through the air. And because otherwise you would get a lot more contagion than is 100% you would see actually a lot more sick people all the time.

Alec: I mean, I can’t remember who stated it, but they said if the germ theory were true, no one would be alive to talk about it. Yeah. You know, and the other thing that I’d like to add on top of this for additional context is one of the experiments that Veda Austin did with eggs. So Yes. We’re gonna have to sort of extrapolate. Off of this and infer a lot of things based on this experiment that I’m about to share. But assuming that there is similarities across different biological systems. This experiment that she did with eggs is she took one free range eggs. So an egg coming from a chicken that was raised in the environment, that a chicken is supposed to be in a natural chicken environment and then set it next to a caged egg for a period of time. Cracked open the eggs, froze the album in and in the egg, the free range egg. It had this crystal and coherent structure on the frozen album in, and typically when she would crack open caged egg and freeze them, they have dis coherence. I don’t even know if that’s a word, but in the state of discord, there’s no like structure to the frozen album in, but just by being in proximity to the free range. AF for a period of time and then being cracked open, having the albumen frozen. This caged egg now had a more coherent structure. And then she then doubled down on this experiment and took one free range egg and set nine caged eggs around it, set one caged egg to the side as a control, cracked all of them open and froze the albumen.

Alec: And the nine caged eggs now had a more coherent structure just by being next to the one free range egg and not the other way around. And that’s the point of emphasis here, is that nature is trying to seek itself, its natural state return back to homeostasis, back to balance, because. I mean, like, you know, it’s almost kind of funny. I’m sitting in front of a computer. I have this freaking bright light shining on me. I have a bunch of electronics around me while I’m doing this. But the point still stands that we’re not living the way human beings are intended to live. I’m sure we’re adapting to some degree, but we’re bombarded with toxins. Even those of us who are seeking in the direction of a more natural approach to health. We’re not living the ways human beings lived naturally in years past. And we’re having to you know, experience these programs, right? If these programs to flush out these toxins in our bodies. And is it crazy to think knowing that we’re made of structured water? Like I said, nine out of 10 molecules in our body are water. That when we are experiencing a state of over toxicity, we would then resonate to others around us, via the waters in our body, to the waters in their body that, Hey, I’m experiencing this. Let’s. Return back to homeostasis, back to balance, back to our natural state together and flesh out these toxins.

Amandha: And again, that maybe if they smell well, I was just saying even if it might be that where it’s an invite to like, come with me, detox with me, brother. Yeah. Or it could, or the signal could be saying, get away from me. Yeah. So someone could have a repulsion. And usually I find that’s through scent. Someone smells off and they’re like, I don’t like the smell. And then they feel repulsed and they wanna go away because it’s not, For them. It’s not for them. It’s not their trigger or it’s Right. It’s telling them something else. So all of these subtle signals, you’re right. Yes. I have a good business model for us, Alec. What we’ll do is we’ll have a nice little room. Okay. And we’ll just sit there and we’ll invite people, you know, they can pay like, you know, donation at the door or something and just come and sit with us and get healthy., just, we just resonate to them. That’s great. You wanna sit with someone healthy? Come on.

Alec: Well, because her study basically was showing right? That it, that the healthy egg wanted to help the sick egg. Yes. And did, right. Exactly. So, and she did another one real quick with with tap water being next in proximity to structured water and the tap water, of course, after just being in proximity to the structured water, had a more coherent structure upon being frozen. But what was really cool is that the structured water now had you know, more coherence, more structure upon being frozen, showing that when you help to heal others, you are actually in the process healing yourself. And this is actually like a perfect segue, I think, into discussing The documentary that’s going around right now, the Died Suddenly documentary. So I want to get your thoughts on that, cuz in my mind I’m sort of tying in what we’re talking about with structured water resonance and helping people find healing and not provoking and inciting fear and people, especially people who have already made these misaligned decisions to receive these products.

Alec: So I wanna hear your take first on the Died Suddenly documentary that’s floating around.

Amandha: Well, you know the last documentary that came out of there, I did a few videos. On the snake water phenomenon,, because I have a really good bullshit meter and it’s taken years to hone. But the second that came out, I knew it was bullshit. I listened. Of course, I didn’t just assume even though I could have because I felt that was so, but I still watched it. I still went through it. I was like, bullshit, bullshit, bullshit. This is. Truth, and what’s the game here then? What’s the controlled position? And I feel like the, those, remember I was explaining about those people who were with the frontline doctors, who was like, who were like, look, we have other treatments for COVID. Yeah. We don’t need this. The shots are hurting people, whatever. Right? Like this was their approach. Like, we have, why are you telling us not to use our treatment?. Well, that’s the camp that would watch this type of film and believe it. I think because they don’t have this correction that we’ve been talking about in their thinking. They’re still operating from the false science. Right. And this germ theory paradigm and the lab leak stories are all in there and that some drugs are good. They don’t maybe grasp the concept of polymorphism or suppression or some of the bodily mechanisms. They certainly haven’t done work on, in research on Veda Austin or any of the cell biology questions from Ling or Pollock or any of, like, they’re not there in the awareness, right.

Amandha: They’re coming to it, but the problem is, I feel like these are hit pieces for the truth community. They’re not meant for those who are trying to wake up. Maybe you’ll get, like you said at the beginning, we were talking about, you know, might get like a few people who wake up from it or whatever and you know, great. But that’s not the, that’s not the goal. Usually of such a thing. It’s generally to to separate people who are trying to align, right?. Cause why would you infiltrate the truth movement, or why would you need to? Well, obviously that’s, they see us as the enemy, so they’re gonna make sure that they cause a lot of confusion and division. And also to create controversy to cause fear to create drama and to argument and all I’m sure that the Twitter spheres just fluff. Like it’s just all fluffed up right now. Again drama, drama argument drama. Time wasting, never getting to the every single doctor in that documentary. We’ve already either tried to debate on the virology topic or had really weird email conversations with like, Kirs, who just does something wrong with that man’s mind, man. Cause it’s not that hard. Ok. Yeah. You know, it is what it is. It’s that stage of growth that. Maybe we have to go through, for some reason, to discern, to learn discernment.

Alec: You know? Exactly. First off I completely agree with everything that you’ve said, and it’s do I think we should communicate the harms of these products? Yes, absolutely. Do I think that we should continually continue to highlight true information regarding these products? Yes. But when you help people to understand that there is actually no reason ever to take these products, because the very premise that these products were made off of is, is the germ theory and the viral theory, which isn’t even a proper theory because that’s a conversation for another time. Scientific theory implies that it’s undergone scrutiny based on the scientific method. It hasn’t. So, but the point is that it’s based in a false premise. That’s the more important thing to focus on. And then even for people who aren’t ready to go there yet, because I do acknowledge that it requires cog, a lot of sorting through cognitive dissonance on the reality that there is no proof of these submicroscopic pathogenic particles. We can still comment on how it’s, there’s never a reason to receive these products simply because you can maintain vibrant health without them entirely. And that’s the position that my wife and I took prior to ever waking up to the nonsense of germ theory. We just said, we don’t need these things because you can maintain health without them.

Alec: And yes, they are harmful. So we wanna educate you on that too. But it’s more important to lead people to an understanding that is, that allows them a sigh of relief rather than stoking. And yes, maybe it will have some effect in deterring people from receiving the products. But the reality is, at this point in time, overwhelmingly, people have made their decision. The people who have not received the products are probably not going to overwhelmingly two and a half years into this nonsense. The people who have are either already aware and going to stop, or they’re going to continue receiving them. And could you imagine taking this documentary that again, is inciting fear, inciting rage, making people afraid and showing it to someone who’s received these products, how would they respond after watching that? They be put into a perpetual state of fear, and that’s not what we want. Rather than instilling fear into those people, for those who are aware that they made a bad decision, right? It’s more important in my mind to educate them like. You know, yes, there are harmful things associated with these products. Like, yes, they are causing harm in people, but here’s the reality. You can heal The body is self-healing, self regenerating. And if we focus on that, focus on the reality of how powerful the body is, it will also deter people from ever even making a decision to receive these products. Because why would you, if the body has a capacity to heal and regenerate on.

Amandha: And it also gives them a conflict shock of diagnosis. And we know that diagnosis gives conflict shock to the point where the mind takes it and runs with it even down to the day in which a diagnosis is given, that they’ll die on that day. They will die on that day. Yeah. So when you do a documentary like that where you’re telling someone that now they’ve done something that is going to kill them and create these clots inside of them and so forth, then that’s a conflict shock that will have to be rectified. And for a majority of those people that could lead them into a worsening health outcome. That’s why I won’t tell certain people that are just totally bought into it. I don’t try to tell them a lot of things because actually I feel like we have to protect them in a way by not telling those types. Like, you know, because they’re not equipped. It’s like children’s. Protecting children from thoughts and things. They’re not ready to handle or they don’t have the capability to deal with. And that’s, you know, the sad truth of it. But yeah you’re totally right. I mean, this is it’s very fear based.

Amandha: Like I watched it I had a hard time getting through it because I know I’ve already dealt with a lot of these doctors who just don’t un they just keep pushing the buyer’s agenda forward despite us, you know, inviting them into debates, things, and. They the, also, the problem I found is with the clotting did we really, are we really sure, because I don’t think we did that research to prove that embalmers don’t find such clots before that this is not, this is actually a part of like sudden death will produce some of these things. Like do we, are we sure. Like it. And this is where, why it causes a problem. Because if you don’t do the proper research first, when you come out with a theory, then when someone’s coming in with another approach, even from the side that’s advancing the fact that we don’t need biologics like shots to do anything, it gets confusing because then they don’t know where you’re coming from. You’re like, well, we have a clotting mechanism problem with all the shots and especially this new one cuz it’s really violent. But do, are we sure that these long things that they did so much footage of this disgusting, you know, and it’s a fricking snuff film where a woman actually dies in the documentary, which I think, oh wow. I mean, she’s getting sucked under the subway train. I mean, she’s dead. And we watched that. It’s a snuff film. I remember that was a kid that was like a big deal to watch someone die. You’re not allowed to on television., that’s a shock too, right? Yeah. But so like pulling all this gore and blood and bits outta the body, are we sure.

Amandha: That this is not a phenomenon that we actually haven’t seen before that because my partner’s sister works for a funeral home and her partner is at the top embalmer there, and so she assists. Right. They have not seen any of those CLOs so far, so, so then that makes you go, wait a second. Like is it just some areas that are seeing this particular material, like, like what’s happening here? Now we have to look at that because, you know, that doesn’t, isn’t lining up across the board, so there might be another phenomenon to explain and it absolutely could be but the point is that the But it discredits the whole thing problem.

Alec: Yes, exactly. The amount that we’re focusing on that as like the main thing surrounding these, rather than, again, to emphasize focusing on that these products are entirely irrelevant. They shouldn’t even be in the realm of possibilities to choose because there is no proof of these particles whatsoever that are passed around. Allegedly passed around between people making them six. And that’s another point of emphasis here, is that not only does this documentary avoid covering that, it actually perpetuates the nonsense of germ theory. That there was a manmade lab created virus that was either pushed out on purpose or escaped from a lab. And that is actually more harmful because again, over time, yes, people are waking up to the nonsense of COVID, but then they will fall for the next propaganda bullshit surrounding the next lab leak or the next virus that’s going around. RSV is a perfect example of that, and so refusing to cover the root that there is no proof of these things actually is more harmful. Telling these half truths is leading people in the wrong direct. And I mean, if you were new to any of this discussion or any, like, anything to do with that the vaccines are harmful. Okay. Say you’re like, somebody sees this face, says, oh, grandpa’s gotta watch this, or whatever. The opening credits are questionable because they show like the moon landing and they show all of these other sort of conspiratorial, like in the normy culture, those are cons considered conspiracies.

Alec: So when you open a film with snap visuals of what people automatically repel from because they’re told their conspiracies right away, you have just set up the stage for where their mind’s gonna be watching it. So this is definitely not a video that has been made for normy culture or waking people up or any of that. So then you have to ask the question, well, why Yeah. What’s, who’s the target audience and what’s the result supposed to be from this? And ultimately it comes down to the same thing as the snake water crap, is to discredit the truth or community to cause division among the truth or community to create a waste of fricking time again, where we have to talk all about this again and debunk shit and clear shit up. And, you know, same cacophony, but I’m not, we’re better we’re, I have to say we’re doing better. Because from my feed from the last round to now, there’s a little more, there’s a little more, oh, I don’t know. First before, oh my God, you have to watch it. I mean, there’s still a lot of that. And I’m like, oh, 30 day band. Like, I’m just. I don’t wanna see these people. Okay. They weed them out like, oh yeah, you like that, Hey, we’re out. No, see me clean up. My Facebook friends feed a lot, but and it’s it’s. It’s funny because even between the Anthony Fauci documentary that was floating around a few weeks ago, which again propagated the germ theory nonsense and also put Anthony Fauci as this like fall guy, essentially like, oh, if we just get him out of the way, then all this will collapse and we’ll be good to go.

Alec: Like it’s absolute nonsense. But even from that to this now, I see less and less people buying into the fear the rage. And that’s the point. Just as you were saying, it’s like clearly this was not made for those who aren’t awake yet because again, they won’t watch it because of how theatrical and sensationalized it appears and comes across. And even if they do, it’s not helpful to them cause it stokes them into fear. But for those of us who are already awake to some level, all it will do for the unaware, it will incite rage within us and be like, ah, people need to see this. And then also get us to latch onto the germ theory nonsense. So again, it’s massive. Harmful for this space. I just don’t see any way that it could be of benefit to the larger mission at hand. And that’s dispelling the germ theory nonsense and also helping people understand that they have all that they need to find true healing within them.

Amandha: Oh yeah, a hundred percent. And I think, you know, we’re getting there.

Amandha: It’s slow, but it’s, we’re crawling on hands and knee but we are picking up momentum. And I even noticed where I don’t have, I always felt like, oh my gosh, nobody’s talking about this. I gotta jump in now. I have to involve myself. Like I, I always felt like we had to do this, but now I see more people picking it up and dispelling it and getting to, you know, like there was a really good article I posted on my telegram group today that Andy Calin actually shared in our group today. I was like, okay, you know, this is someone, there’s more people now carrying the load, right? And that helps us all. And so the more that we can do this from truth and integrity, from calm stability of our emotions, not reacting, getting all crazy on stuff. Like just cuz I got people, I put in my Twitter this. You know, article today, and of course I knew I would get there, would be people upset and, but one guy said, okay. At first I started reading it and I immediately, my first reaction is, I going to unfollow. Right?, I’m gonna unfollow this. That was his first but then he said, but wait a sec. But then he stopped himself and he said, okay, maybe there’s something else I should know. And he went and read the article and he came and he said, I’m so glad I did that. Now I see I just witnessed my own self. He had total self-awareness of how he was triggered, what his first reaction was gonna be. And he caught himself and he did the work. And he came back thankful. And I was like, you are the model of what everyone needs to do.

Amandha: That, and I just applauded him. I said, I’m, I feel like a proud mama. You know, Cause that’s our maturity, right? Yeah. It’s okay to disagree. But if the emotions come and punch and scream and this, we’re really not gonna get much further in this. So I’m very happy to see at least a little bit of improvement from the last round in our community,

Alec: Yep. And that’s the thing is like you and I and people like us are open to being wrong, which is ironically what led us down the path of discovering that the germ theory is false because we had to go against our whole previous paradigm and perceptions and way of seeing the world. And that willingness is what people need to, I think, instill as major pieces in their life is just the willingness to question your own perceptions. And I think you know, people are starting to wake up to that understanding and working through their triggers, which is good. But Amandha, this was awesome. Thank you so much for joining me. Thank you. You’re the first person I thought of when I was like, I really wanna discuss this RSV thing. Just cuz I knew it would be a really fun conversation and insightful and help other people understand. So thank you so much. Is there anything else you wanna share as we close out?

Amandha: No, not really. Just we’ll keep The truth is simple. I think people need to understand that when they start to recognize patterns, when they start to apply the knowledge again and again they come to the same simplicity and they the dis the hard parts, like the part where it’s confusing or you’re not know, that fades away over time and actually gets easier and you come quicker to the knowledge and the truth starts, you start to buff that truth and it starts to shine. And now even when it’s foggy, you can see it at a distance, you know? And so it’s hopeful because that means the work that you put in and the things that you overcome in yourself, the rewards are great for that because now the next time and the next time, it’s easier and easier as you traverse the lies, as you try to tear away those shady foundations and work to really hone that essence inside of yourself. And it’s joyful. It becomes more joyful when you realize that. This place is wonderful. It’s meant to be a beautiful experience in existence and if we can just work that, you know, tear those lives apart, we’re gonna get to it, you know, one piece at a time, one individual at a time. So not to give up, just to continue to work on yourself to, to. To clarify your thinking and to you know, own, own it. Own it all. Own the mistakes, own the confusion. Be okay with being, not knowing something for a while. You know, sleeping on it, asking for inner direction. And writing it out, whatever you gotta do to move the energy through. But this is what we’re supposed to be doing.

Amandha: I really feel that. And if we all just start to do that means we’re all going to be able to get out of this control faction that is really encroaching very quickly right now, probably because they see that we’re not falling for their scams as easily. And that’s gonna be more power to us and then more power to the next generations. So, so lift your heart and keep hope and keep working at it. And we’re all here for each and every one of you with whatever we can share and however we can support everyone. So, and you can come sit with Amandha and I in a room and resonate with us to achieve true. I love that. So I did that in India, right. And I didn’t understand that. I’ve explained that. Like I went to see a guru, he’s like this top Indian guru. It’s this big deal to go see him. And he just came in, sat down and I was sitting next like near him and he asked me, oh, How is your mother, you know? I’m like this. I’m like, what is this? I’m supposed to get some enlightenment. Here he is just shooting the shit about the weather and then I got up and left and it took me a while, years later to understand that it was, I was getting resonance from his field from him and that was the gift, right?

Alec: So it’s a legit concept business model.

Amandha: I just thought it was hilarious in the way you described it.

Alec: It was so funny. That was good. Okay. Thank you man. This is awesome.

Amandha: Thank you, Alec. Thanks so much.